Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Department of Defense Whistleblower, Office of Special Counsel Prompt Fix to Overly Restrictive Army Policy

January 04, 2018

disclosure of wrongdoing

A DoD whistleblower disclosure to OSC prompted a DoD investigation and agency  action to reverse an impermissibly strict Army policy.

A Department of Defense (DoD) whistleblower disclosure to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) prompted a DoD investigation and agency action to reverse an impermissibly strict Army policy limiting the eligibility of law  enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms off duty.  The Secretary of Defense directed the Army to  remove its overly restrictive eligibility criteria, and DoD is reviewing the law enforcement  concealed firearms carrying policies of all agency components.

The case came to OSC from Shaun Lomax, an Army civilian police officer, who alleged that DoD and  the Army implemented policies that appeared to violate federal law by improperly  granting departmental components the authority to impose additional criteria on “qualified law enforcement officer” status. The status is a designation explicitly defined by the Amended Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 (LEOSA). The law allows a qualified law enforcement officer to carry a concealed firearm, regardless of state or local laws, while off duty for the

purpose of personal protection and law enforcement actions in exigent circumstances. Beyond the specific criteria established in the statute, an Army Directive required an individual to “show 6 years of cumulative police experience ...” to qualify for an identification card.

DoD’s investigation substantiated that the additional requirement violated LEOSA. The report noted that the requirement improperly imposed additional restrictions on Army law enforcement officers to obtain “qualified law enforcement officer status.” The whistleblower  asserted and the agency confirmed that the statute does not contemplate additional restrictions on eligibility beyond those enumerated in the statute.  DoD is taking corrective action as a result of these findings.

“OSC has reviewed the original disclosure, the reports, and Mr. Lomax’s comments,” Special Counsel Henry J. Kerner wrote to President Trump. “While Mr. Lomax had significant  concerns about the pendency of revisions to the

Directive and associated issues, the agency initiated a significant and substantive policy revision. Accordingly, I have determined that the  reports meet all statutory requirements and the findings appear reasonable.”

OSC sent copies of the agency reports, the letter to the President, and the whistleblower’s comments to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Senate and House Armed Services  Committees. OSC also filed a copy of the letter to the President, the reports, and the whistleblower’s comments in its public file, available at www.osc.gov. This matter is now closed.

U.S. Office of Special Counsel

An Official website of the Federal Government

Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov